from a press release issued by Bill de Blasio, 39th District, Brooklyn, on August 22nd, 2007:
COUNCILMEMBER DE BLASIO TO PROPOSE STYROFOAM BAN
City Hall— Council Member Bill de Blasio will introduce legislation at today’s Stated Meeting that would prohibit the use of Styrofoam by City agencies and food establishments. De Blasio’s bill would ban the use of Styrofoam by all city agencies. The Department of Education (DOE), for example, goes through 850,000 Styrofoam trays a day which add up to over 4 million trays per week and over 153 million per school year. In June, Councilmember de Blasio joined Parents Against Styrofoam in Schools (P.A.S.S.) to call on the DOE to switch to either reusable plastic trays or trays that are biodegradable.
Polystyrene, more widely known as Styrofoam, is composed of Benzene, Styrene and Ethylene, which are all listed on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s hazardous substance list. Styrofoam is virtually immune to biological decomposition and also resists compacting and therefore, by volume, consumes more landfill space than other types of materials, such as paper. Due to the physical properties of polystyrene foam, the EPA states, “that such materials can also have serious impacts on human health, wildlife, the aquatic environment and the economy.”
“It is mind boggling that our City which is becoming a leader on environmental issues, is still using Styrofoam when we know it is extremely harmful to our environment and creating massive amounts of waste,” said Councilmember de Blasio, a member of the City Council’s Environmental Protection Committee. “It is unacceptable that the DOE is using Styrofoam, a substance that once it hits our landfills stays there forever.”
The legislation will also include a ban on Styrofoam “to-go” containers used by city restaurants and delis. The bill states that “no owner, operator or employee of a food establishment shall place, wrap, or otherwise package food or beverages in packaging made of polystyrene foam or offer for sale food or beverages packed in such material.”
The cities of Berkeley, California and Portland, Oregon were some of the first to prohibit polystyrene food packaging. Other jurisdictions which have instituted similar bans on polystyrene include: San Francisco, California, Freeport, Maine, Santa Cruz, California, Santa Monica, California, Sonoma County, California, Malibu, California and San Clemente, California.
Styrofoam Fact Sheet
➢ Polystyrene, or the Dow Chemical brand name, Styrofoam, is composed of Benzene, Styrene, and ethylene. Polystyrene becomes Styrofoam when it is injected with certain gases, known as blowing agents, to make it 30 times lighter than its original weight.
➢ The biggest environmental health concern associated with polystyrene is the danger
associated with Styrene, the basic building block of polystyrene. Styrene is classified as a possible human carcinogen by the EPA and by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
➢ 1986 EPA report on solid waste named the polystyrene manufacturing process as the 5th largest creator of hazardous waste.· The National Bureau of Standards Center for Fire Research identified 57 chemical byproducts released during the combustion of polystyrene foam. The process of making polystyrene pollutes the air and creates large amounts of liquid and solid waste.
➢ Studies show that toxic chemicals can leak out of these products into the food that they contain (especially when heated in a microwave). These chemicals threaten human health and reproductive systems. These products are made with petroleum, a non-sustainable and heavily polluting resource.
➢ Polystyrene foam is often dumped into the environment as litter. This material is notorious for breaking up into pieces that choke animals and clog their digestive systems.
➢ Initially a portion of polystyrene production was aided by the use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), the chemicals that break down ozone in the troposphere. When this issue came to light, polystyrene manufacturers negotiated a gradual phase-out of CFCs in the production process and no CFCs have been used since the late 1980's. Though polystyrene manufacturers claim that their products are "ozone-friendly" or free of CFCs, this is only partially true. Some polystyrene is now manufactured with HCFC-22, which, though less destructive than its chemical cousins, CFC’s, is still a greenhouse gas and harmful to the ozone layer. In fact, according to a 1992 study by the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, HCFCs are three to five times more destructive to the ozone layer than previously believed.
Source: "Polystyrene Foam Report." Earth Resource Foundation.
Tuesday, August 28, 2007
Hooray for NYC Council Member Bill de Blasio!!
Posted by Denise at 7:33 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
That is great news! I am currently in San Francisco, visiting the city where I used to make my home. In the time since I moved to de Blasio's area of NYC, my former hometown has instituted a Styrofoam ban (as noted in the post.) I didn't realize this until getting takeout from a local eatery (Bok Choy Garden in the Richmond, for anyone interested) that I regularly visited when I lived here. The dish I always ordered came in a Styrofoam tray/lid deal. This time, however, it was in a similar container; but made of a thin plastic rather than Styrofoam. I mentioned this change, and that's when my friend told me about the ban which has been in place for a while. No takeout food in San Francisco is packaged in Styrofoam these days.
Which is great! However now I'm curious about the plastic which is being used instead. My particular container was either defective, or the food had burned a hole in it... because as I lifted it from the bag the contents came spilling out from underneath. Not too pleasant since it was a very hot dish. Anyway, the thought that the food heat may have melted it was disconcerting. I think it was more likely a weak spot, but still... are restaurants simply opting for another form of plastic which is no better for health or environment than Styrofoam?
In an offline discussion, The "Future Earthling" (uh, the host of this blog) noted that it might have been a bio-plastic-- an environmentally-friendly "plastic" substance-- which might be a bit more fragile than "real" plastics. To know for sure would certainly ease my mind a bit.
Anyway, I hope that along with banning materials like Styrofoam, local governments will also educate businesses about ecologically and health-friendly substitutes... rather than forcing them to adopt questionably more "green" substitutes, like different-- yet still noxious-- plastics.
On that note, how about water bottle bans, and banning plastic shopping bags? Those would be great candidates for the next target of officials like de Blasio. I believe San Francisco has already instituted a tax on the use of plastic bags in grocery stores. It's a start...!
Dirt,
There are often ways to know what kind of plastic you are dealing with, such as the number within the triangle. I am working on a post called "Know Your Plastic', but meanwhile, I found a site with very similar information: http://www.valcorerecycling.org/affair/archives/2002-08-04.htm
Of course, I don't believe there are any regulations requiring plastics to be labelled, but if something were a bioplastic, it would probably be labelled as such just to brag if for no other reason. (For more info, see the entry for bioplastic on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioplastic)
Even without regulation, companies have been responsive to consumer complaints about over-use of plastics. Almost all of the packages I have received in recent years directly from retailers have been much more eco-consciously packed than I remember from the 80s and 90s, when every shipped item was drowning in those horrible styrofoam packing peanuts.
This is proof that you can make a difference by letting the people buy from know you will cease purchasing from them unless they re-think their packaging. Let's get to work on the Apple Computer Company. They have so many great designers, why can't they package in anything better than styrofoam?
Post a Comment